World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Judgment of Solomon

Article Id: WHEBN0005666025
Reproduction Date:

Title: Judgment of Solomon  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Solomon, St. Lambrecht's Abbey, Deadlock provision, The Seven, City Hall (Delft)
Collection: Books of Kings, Metaphors Referring to People, Proverbs, Solomon, Trials Regarding Custody of Children
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Judgment of Solomon

The Judgment of Solomon refers to a story from the Hebrew Bible in which King Solomon of Israel ruled between two women both claiming to be the mother of a child by tricking the parties into revealing their true feelings. It has become an archetypal example of argument to moderation and that of an impartial judge displaying wisdom in making a ruling.


  • Biblical narrative 1
  • Genre 2
  • Jewish interpretation 3
  • "Splitting the baby" 4
  • Representations in art 5
    • Other media 5.1
  • See also 6
  • Footnotes 7
  • External links 8

Biblical narrative

School of The Judgement of Salomon, 1500.

The story is recounted in 1 Kings 3:16-28. Two young women who lived in the same house and who both had an infant son came to Solomon for a judgment. One of the women claimed that the other, after accidentally smothering her own son while sleeping, had exchanged the two children to make it appear that the living child was hers. The other woman denied this and so both women claimed to be the mother of the living son and said that the dead boy belonged to the other.

After some deliberation, King Solomon called for a sword to be brought before him. He declared that there was only one fair solution: the live son must be split in two, each woman receiving half of the child. Upon hearing this terrible verdict, the boy's true mother cried out, "Oh Lord, give the baby to her, just don't kill him!" The liar, in her bitter jealousy, exclaimed, "It shall be neither mine nor yours—divide it!"

The king declared the first mother as the true mother, as a true, loving mother would rather surrender her baby to another than hurt him, and gave her the baby. King Solomon's judgment became known throughout all of Israel and was considered an example of profound wisdom.


The story is commonly viewed in scholarship as an instance or a reworking of a folktale. It is classified as Aarne-Thompson tale type 926. Many parallel stories have been found in world folklore.[1] Several suggestions for the genre of the story have been raised, beyond its characterization as a folktale. The story is commonly associated with the wisdom genre. Eli Yassif classifies it as a wisdom novella.[2] Edward Lipinski suggests that the story is an example of "king's bench tales", a subgenre of the wisdom literature to which he finds parallels in Sumerian literature.[3] Stuart Lasine classifies it as a law-court riddle.[4] Some scholars think that the original folk story underwent significant literary reworking, so that in its current form it can no longer be defined as a folktale. Jacob Liver notes the absence of any "local coloring" in the story, and concludes that the story is "not an actual folk tale but a scholarly reworking of a folk tale (apparently from a non-Israelite source) which in some way reached the court circles of Jerusalem in the times of Solomon".[5] Similarly, Jeev Weisman characterizes it as "a wisdom anecdote which originated in the court circles".[6]

Jewish interpretation

The Judgment of Solomon by William Blake in Tempera. Currently, the object is held at the Fitzwilliam Museum.[7]

According to the Midrash, the two women were mother- and daughter-in-law, both of whom had borne sons and whose husbands had died. The lying daughter-in-law was obligated by the laws of Yibbum to marry her brother-in-law unless released from the arrangement through a formal ceremony. As her brother-in-law was the living child, she was required to marry him when he came of age, or wait the same amount of time to be released and remarry. When Solomon suggested that the infant be split in half, the lying woman, wishing to escape the constraints of Yibbum in the eyes of God, agreed. Thus was Solomon able to know who the real mother was.[8]

"Splitting the baby"

The expressions "splitting the baby" or "cutting the baby in half" are sometimes used in the legal profession for a form of simple compromise: solutions which "split the difference" in terms of damage awards or other remedies (e.g. a judge dividing fault between the two parties in a comparative negligence case).[9]

Representations in art

The Pompean "House of the Physician" was discovered to be the location of the first known painting of a Biblical story, the Judgement of Solomon (presently moved to the Museo Nazionale in Naples).[10]

Sculpture given either to Pietro Lamberti or to Nanni di Bartolo. It stands at the corner of the Doge's Palace in Venice (Italy), next to Porta della Carta

This theme has long been a popular subject for artists and is often chosen for decoration of courthouses. In the Netherlands, many 17th century courthouses (Vierschaar rooms) contain a painting or relief of this scene. Elsewhere in Europe, celebrated examples include:

Other media

The scene has been the subject of television episodes of Dinosaurs, Recess, The Simpsons (where a pie was substituted for the baby), the Netflix animated series, All Hail King Julien, where a pineapple is cut in two to settle a dispute, the Seinfeld episode The Seven, and Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. It has influenced other artistic disciplines, e.g. Bertolt Brecht's play The Caucasian Chalk Circle and Ronnie snatching Kat's baby in EastEnders.

The HIM song "Shatter Me With Hope" includes the line "We'll tear this baby apart, wise like Solomon".

A surgical technique that involves dividing the placenta with a laser as a treatment for Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is named 'Solomon technique'.[11]

See also


  1. ^ See Hugo Gressmann, "Das salomonische Urteil", Deutsche Rundschau 130 (1907), pp. 212-228
  2. ^ Eli Yassif, The Hebrew Folktale: History, Genre, Meaning (Folklore Studies in Translation), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999, pp. 29-30
  3. ^ Edward Lipinski, "Ancient Types of Wisdom Literature in Biblical Narrative", in Alexander Rofé and Yair Zakovitch (eds.), Isac Leo Seeligmann Volume, Jerusalem: E. Rubenstein, 1983, pp. 51-55
  4. ^ Stuart Lasine, "The Riddle of Solomon’s Judgment and the Riddle of Human Nature in the Hebrew Bible", Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 45 (1989), p. 61
  5. ^ Jacob Liver, "The Book of the Acts of Solomon", Biblica 48 (1967), p. 82
  6. ^ Jeev Weisman, Political Satire in the Bible (The Biblical Encyclopaedia Library 13), Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 1996 (Hebrew), p. 213. George W. Coats also characterizes it as an anecdote ("Parable, Fable, and Anecdote: Storytelling in the Succession Narrative", Interpretation 35 [1981], p. 379)
  7. ^ Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi (eds.). """The Judgment of Solomon, object 1 (Butlin 392) "The Judgment of Solomon.  
  8. ^ "Jewish Law - Commentary/Opinion - The Brilliant Wisdom of King Solomon". 
  9. ^ Stephanie E. Keer and Richard W. Naimark, Arbitrators Do Not “Split-the-Baby”: Empirical Evidence from International Business Arbitrations from the Energy Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee
  10. ^ [2]
  11. ^ Slaghekke, F.; Lopriore, E.; Lewi, L.; Middeldorp, J. M.; Van Zwet, E. W.; Weingertner, A. S.; Klumper, F. J.; Dekoninck, P.; Devlieger, R.; Kilby, M. D.; Rustico, M. A.; Deprest, J.; Favre, R.; Oepkes, D. (2014). "Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: An open-label randomised controlled trial". The Lancet.  

External links

  • D. L. Ashliman, Child Custody: folktales of Aarne-Thompson type 926, variants on the tale
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Fair are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.