World Library  

Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Hillslope Characteristics as Controls of Subsurface Flow Variability : Volume 16, Issue 10 (19/10/2012)

By Bachmair, S.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0004010566
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 17
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Hillslope Characteristics as Controls of Subsurface Flow Variability : Volume 16, Issue 10 (19/10/2012)  
Author: Bachmair, S.
Volume: Vol. 16, Issue 10
Language: English
Subject: Science, Hydrology, Earth
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Publication Date:
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications


APA MLA Chicago

Weiler, M., & Bachmair, S. (2012). Hillslope Characteristics as Controls of Subsurface Flow Variability : Volume 16, Issue 10 (19/10/2012). Retrieved from

Description: Institute of Hydrology, University of Freiburg, Germany. Hillslope hydrological dynamics, particularly subsurface flow (SSF), are highly variable and complex. A profound understanding of factors controlling this variability is needed. Therefore we investigated the relationship between variability of shallow water table dynamics and various hillslope characteristics. We ask whether measurable hillslope properties explain patterns of subsurface flow variability. To approach this question, shallow water table dynamics of three adjacent large-scale hillslopes were monitored with high spatial and temporal resolution over 18 months. The hillslopes are similar in terms of topography and parent material, but different in vegetation cover (grassland, coniferous forest, and mixed forest). We expect vegetation to be an important driver of water table dynamics at our study site, especially given the minor differences in topography. Various hillslope properties were determined in the field and via GIS analysis: common topography descriptors, well depth, soil properties via slug tests, and several vegetation parameters. Response variables characterizing the water table response per well were calculated for different temporal scales (entire time series, seasonal scale, event scale). Partial correlation analysis and a Random Forest machine learning approach were carried out to assess the explainability of SSF variability by measurable hillslope characteristics. We found a complex interplay of predictors, yet soil properties and topography showed the highest single explanatory power. Surprisingly, vegetation characteristics played a minor role. Solely throughfall and canopy cover exerted a slightly stronger control, especially in summer. Most importantly, the examined hillslope characteristics explained only a small proportion of the observed SSF variability. Consequently there must be additional important drivers not represented by current measurement techniques of the hillslope configuration (e.g. bedrock properties, preferential pathways). We also found interesting differences in explainability of SSF variability among temporal scales and between both forested hillslopes and the grassland hillslope.

Hillslope characteristics as controls of subsurface flow variability

Anderson, A. E., Weiler, M., Alila, Y., and Hudson, R. O.: Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 935–944, doi:10.5194/hess-13-935-2009, 2009.; Arno, K., Lindemann, J., Schellenberger, A., Beierkuhnlein, C., Kaupenjohann, M., and Peiffer, S.: Slope deposits and water paths in a spring catchment, Frankenwald, Bavaria, Germany, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 50, 119–126, 1998.; Aryal, S., O'Loughlin, E., and Mein, R.: A similarity approach to predict landscape saturation in catchments, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1208, doi:10.1029/2001WR000864, 2002.; Bachmair, S., Weiler, M., and Nützmann, G.: Controls of land use and soil structure on water movement: Lessons for pollutant transfer through the unsaturated zone, J. Hydrol., 369, 241–252, 2009.; Bachmair, S., Weiler, M., and Troch, P. A.: Intercomparing hillslope hydrological dynamics: spatio–temporal variability and vegetation cover effects, Water Resour. Res., 48, W05537, doi:10.1029/2011WR011196, 2012.; Berne, A., Uijlenhoet, R., and Troch, P.: Similarity analysis of subsurface flow response of hillslopes with complex geometry, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09410, doi:10.1029/2004WR003629, 2005.; Bogaart, P. W. and Troch, P. A.: Curvature distribution within hillslopes and catchments and its effect on the hydrological response, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 925–936, doi:10.5194/hess-10-925-2006, 2006.; Bouwer, H. and Rice, R.: A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resour. Res., 12, 423–428, 1976.; Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001.; Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1984.; Chang, S. and Matzner, E.: The effect of beech stemflow on spatial patterns of soil solution chemistry and seepage fluxes in a mixed beech/oak stand, Hydrol. Process., 14, 135–144, 2000.; Chifflard, P., Didszun, J., and Zepp, H.: Skalenübergreifende Prozess-Studien zur Abflussbildung in Gebieten mit periglazialen Deckschichten (Sauerland, Deutschland), Grundwasser, 13, 27–41, 2008.; Coenders-Gerrits, A. M. J., Hopp, L., Savenije, H. H. G., and Pfister, L.: The effect of spatial throughfall patterns on soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 8625–8663, doi:10.5194/hessd-9-8625-2012, 2012.; De'Ath, G.: Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships, Ecology, 83, 1105–1117, 2002.; D\'{i}az-Uriarte, R. and De Andres, S. A.: Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-3, 2006.; Frazer, G. W., Canham, C. D., and Lertzman, K. P.: Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation., Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, 1999.; Freer, J., McDonnell, J., Beven, K., Peters, N., Burns, D., Hooper, R., Aulenbach, B., and Kendall, C.: The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1269, doi:10.1029/2001WR000872, 2002.; Fujimoto, M., Ohte, N., and Tani, M.: Effects of hillslope topography on hydrological responses in a weathered granite mountain, Japan: compa


Click To View

Additional Books

  • Influence of Infiltration and Soil Stora... (by )
  • Combining Satellite Radar Altimetry, Sar... (by )
  • A Multi-scale ''Soil Water Structure'' M... (by )
  • Does Evaporation Paradox Exist in China?... (by )
  • Integrating Modis Images in a Water Budg... (by )
  • Temporal and Spatial Changes of Water Qu... (by )
  • Stream Depletion Rate with Horizontal or... (by )
  • Acid Episodes in the Allt A'Mharcaidh, S... (by )
  • Observed Variability and Trends in Extre... (by )
  • Comparison of Three Updating Schemes Usi... (by )
  • Ensemble Projections of Future Streamflo... (by )
  • Time Dependent Dispersivity Behavior of ... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Fair are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.